«

»

Sep 19

The Evolution of Everything 3: The New Reformation

‘Abdu’l-Baha

From every standpoint the world of humanity is undergoing a re-formation. The laws of former governments and civilizations are in process of revision, scientific ideas and theories are developing and advancing to meet a new range of phenomena, invention and discovery are penetrating hitherto unknown fields revealing new wonders and hidden secrets of the material universe; industries have vastly wider scope and production; everywhere the world of mankind is in the throes of evolutionary activity indicating the passing of the old conditions and advent of the new age of re-formation. Old trees yield no fruitage; old ideas and methods are obsolete and worthless now. Old standards of ethics, moral codes and methods of living in the past will not suffice for the present age of advancement and progress. — Abdu’l-Bahá, True Modernism, Foundations of World Unity

Three decades ago, when I first encountered the Bahá’í Faith, this concept of the coming of age of mankind was something I hadn’t heard of before. Many of the churches I was familiar with—some of which I had attended—held that mankind had been created in perfection, but was increasingly headed in the opposite direction. To put it in scientific terms, entropy happens. In stark contrast, Bahá’u’lláh stated that human beings were a noble creation and were evolving capacities that would allow us to carry forward an ever-advancing civilization. We are, according to Bahá’í sacred texts, growing into our potential as human beings. There is a saying—also from Bahá’í scripture—that the virtues of today’s saints will be the sins of future ones.

Despite what my churches taught, when I actually studied the Biblical texts, they seemed to indicate a similar trajectory. Both the Old and New Testaments presage a time when God’s law will be written on the hearts of human beings rather than learnt by rote or imposed via external authority. Christ urges His followers to be perfect “as the Father is perfect”.

How, one might ask, could that occur without significant growth on our part?

Perhaps that’s a subject for future speculation, but in the last thirty or so years, something interesting has occurred: more and more people whose prose I read, or whose thoughts on the matter I’ve sampled, have suggested that they, too, believe mankind is approaching some sort of new maturity level and that the chaos we seem to be experiencing is much like the pubescent angst and hormonally spawned craziness that many human teens go through on their way to adulthood.

The biggest surprise was that some of this was coming from people who did not consider themselves religious. In fact, one of the places I encountered the idea that we are coming of age as a species was an atheist forum I frequented.

To be sure recent world events can sometimes seem to conflict with this view, but then, I suppose a parent confronting a rebellious teenager they’ve had to drag home from a drunken party might also doubt that this nasty-tempered, disobedient, selfish creature might—in just a few years—turn out to be a truly awesome adult.

I see a lot of that teenaged angstiness in what the world has been going through over the last hundred years or so. And I also see that Abdu’l-Bahá is absolutely right when he says that: 

Old trees yield no fruitage; old ideas and methods are obsolete and worthless now. Old standards of ethics, moral codes and methods of living in the past will not suffice for the present age of advancement and progress.

One of those old standards of ethics that Abdu’l-Bahá speaks of, in my opinion, is the human modality best summed up in the phrase “the selfish gene”. Small children are all about themselves. To one degree or another, they begin to learn through observation of the behavior of their parents, elders and peers, that there are other people in the world and that—as every mother has no doubt informed her child at one time or another—they are not the center of the universe.

This is a hard lesson to learn. Even with a strong desire to learn it, and guidelines for learning it, it is hard. I personally think that being married is a great teacher in the art of putting someone else’s needs before your own. Having children is even more so. I have seen having a child turn a self-centered teen into a nurturing adult and forcing them to grow up very quickly.

Still, something about the teen years triggers an almost flight or fight response in some of us. On the verge of growing up, we suddenly doubt that we really want to do so. We are eager for adult freedom and loathe the thought of adult responsibility. We leap headlong into the exercise of the one and assiduously dodge the other.

But that responsibility will not go away no matter how much we might wish it would. It is the flip side of having adult rights. An adult, for example, may have the right to express himself any way he wishes. Words that were off limits to a child are permissible to an adult. Ditto on behaviors. Often, a teen’s response to suddenly feeling adult-ish is to express her rights by using previously banned words, indulging in previously banned behaviors and doing it in a way that is ultimately harmful to herself and others. We see it so often in society that it’s become a trope, a cliche.

This is also true, I think, of some segments of our global society. For example, Americans take for granted the right to say whatever they wish whenever they wish. We ought, we think, to be able to mock, insult, incite, and humiliate other people and we expect them to be big enough to take it. It is, we assure ourselves, our right to speak our minds. We’re being true to ourselves, we say, and we can’t be expected to consider anyone else’s feelings.

That dialogue is playing out right now with regard to the recent devastating events in Libya. In some ways, it amounts to a war of rights. An American citizen has the right of free speech (which is a principle not well-understood in other parts of the world where sense of community overrides individual expression). Yet, I’ve noted one American after another who, in defending that right, called into question the right of those insulted by an exercise of free speech to even peacefully protest their outrage. It has been well-documented, if not well-reported, that the governments and people of the affected middle eastern countries are horrified at the violence done in the name of their majority faith, even as they are exercising their right to be outraged at the insults to it by an American citizen.

We are, like the stereotypical teen, very much about our own rights but seem to give little thought about the rights and responsibilities of others. Like a teenager, we approach adulthood so hungry for freedom, so enamored of self-determination, that we can neither see nor comprehend how interdependent adult life really is.

In theory, an adult has autonomy. In practice, an adult has duties—toward employers and/or employees, toward spouses and family, toward children, toward community, toward government, toward himself. Our lives meet on every side, are bound together by a network more indestructible than any we have yet fashioned or can even imagine. We are bound to each other by the laws of physics—by human gravity.

I believe the more observant and savvy among us recognize that gravity as love. The same force that binds a mother and daughter or a father and son together even in the moments when the child is in full rebellion. Beneath the shouting and the anger, there is a familial bond that we can damage, even break, but never truly be free of, because—whether we like it or not—we are still bound to each other by the laws of physics.

The fact is, the planet is too small and we are too interdependent to have anything like the autonomy that angsty philosophers like Ayn Rand propose. We can no longer commit groups of “others” to the “them” category by blindly following traditional or popular wisdom about who “they” are. We especially cannot do it on the childish rationale that “well, they’re doing it to us!”

Muslims hate Americans, one segment of American society proposes, so Americans ought to hate Muslims.

Now those of you who are parents or teachers or in some way guardians of children, stop to think what you would tell a child who justified calling a playmate an insulting name or shoving him because “he did it to me, first!” Most child care givers that I know would never accept that excuse from a child for such behavior. And yet I see again and again people justify their hatred of this or that group on the rationale that “well, they hate us, too”. It becomes an endless loop of “yeah, but…”

If it was a child making that time-worn excuse, I think most of us would say, “Grow up and act your age”. Maybe we need to look in the mirror—both as individuals and as a species—and say the same thing. And remind ourselves that if we want adult rights and privileges, we need to be willing to take adult responsibility for what we say and do. rather than blaming someone else—the Americans, the Muslims, THEM.

When I communicate with other people—especially about these volatile issues having to do with identity—I try to bear in mind this passage from Bahá’u’lláh:

Every word is endowed with a spirit, therefore the speaker or expounder should carefully deliver his words at the appropriate time and place, for the impression which each word maketh is clearly evident and perceptible. The Great Being saith: One word may be likened unto fire, another unto light, and the influence which both exert is manifest in the world. Therefore an enlightened man of wisdom should primarily speak with words as mild as milk, that the children of men may be nurtured and edified thereby and may attain the ultimate goal of human existence which is the station of true understanding and nobility. And likewise He saith: One word is like unto springtime causing the tender saplings of the rose-garden of knowledge to become verdant and flourishing, while another word is even as a deadly poison. It behoveth a prudent man of wisdom to speak with utmost leniency and forbearance so that the sweetness of his words may induce everyone to attain that which befitteth man’s station. — Tablets of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 173


Share
PDF Printer    Send article as PDF   

About the author

Maya Bohnhoff

... is a professional writer, editor, recording / performing artist, and Baha'i. She lives in San Jose, CA.

3 comments

  1. Mark H.

    I can recall being a 20-something in college, when during a discussion on rights and freedoms in one of my classes, and exchange student from the MIddle East said, “It seems that you Americans want to be too free.”

    A the time, I took great offense at the statement. But as the years have gone by, I’ve observed quite a lot of truth and insight in it.

    The trouble with this — and so many issues facing us across the globe is, it’s not something that can be written into law or forced by government. For example, I understand the good intentions behind “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws, but they ultimately strike me as attempts at thought-policing. In that regard, I question both their effectiveness, and possible unintended consequences.

    Rather, it seems, these things need to be resolved from the inside. You can’t write a law that could prevent an American from wanting to make an idiotic and offensive video about Muhammed. But likewise, you can’t really write a law preventing a Muslim from having a completely inappropriate, violent over-reaction to said idiotic video.

    To frame things in evangelical terms, we all have to be “born again,” into a greater and deeper understanding, and away from the base urges to even do such things in the first place.

    1. Maya Bohnhoff

      It’s really a catch-22. The answer is to teach our children to be wise, to place great importance on the welfare of others and on community, on spiritual virtues such as cooperation, kindness, trustworthiness, honor, etc. But in this increasingly secular and materialistic culture, parents are less and less able and willing to do this—often because they do not wish to impose their beliefs on their children, but want them to be “free” to make their own choices.

      In America, schools are not encouraged to teach virtues either so the sort of holistic education that would be necessary for some individuals to come to the conclusion that hate speech was wrong is not encouraged here. In other countries—Australia, for example—some school systems have instituted virtues programs. In America, I’ve seen it in charter schools, but not in public ones. Yes, kids are told be “good citizens”, but that citizenship is understood at a very superficial level.

      It really is hard to find a balance because many Americans I talk to don’t believe in balance. They believe that complete freedom is inevitably good. I am reminded of the words of Baha’u'llah: “Consider the pettiness of men’s minds. They ask for that which injureth them, and cast away the thing that profiteth them. They are, indeed, of those that are far astray. We find some men desiring liberty, and priding themselves therein. Such men are in the depths of ignorance.Liberty must, in the end, lead to sedition, whose flames none can quench. Thus warneth you He Who is the Reckoner, the All-Knowing. Know ye that the embodiment of liberty and its symbol is the animal. That which beseemeth man is submission unto such restraints as will protect him from his own ignorance, and guard him against the harm of the mischief-maker. Liberty causeth man to overstep the bounds of propriety, and to infringe on the dignity of his station. It debaseth him to the level of extreme depravity and wickedness. Regard men as a flock of sheep that need a shepherd for their protection. This, verily, is the truth, the certain truth. We approve of liberty in certain circumstances, and refuse to sanction it in others. We, verily, are the All-Knowing.” — Gleanings CLIX

      In another connection, Baha’u'llah notes, in speaking of moderation: “The civilization, so often vaunted by the learned exponents of arts and sciences, will, if allowed to overleap the bounds of moderation, bring great evil upon men. Thus warneth you He Who is the All-Knowing. If carried to excess, civilization will prove as prolific a source of evil as it had been of goodness when kept within the restraints of moderation. Meditate on this, O people, and be not of them that wander distraught in the wilderness of error. The day is approaching when its flame will devour the cities…” (ibid. CIXLV)

      I know the thought of needing a shepherd is as offensive to some folks as the idea of needing an adult guardian or rules is to some adolescents. And, like some adolescents, the deeper we are in our own doo-doo, the more we fight the idea that—just maybe—we need help, guidance, wisdom. That we are not complete in and of ourselves. That, in a word, we have something we can learn from others.

      I’ve raised two kids to adulthood and am working on the third. The pattern in society is remarkably similar to the trajectory of a young teen. I’ve made a point of teaching my kids that contributing to the well being of humanity is Job One. In doing that, I’ve presented the idea that there are human/spiritual virtues that they need to master in order to do that job. I have striven to teach them how to look at every situation, reverse engineer it, apply principles to it, think it through rationally, bearing those virtues and principles in mind. I’ve also taught them that the exercise of their rational faculty to control their emotional urges is both positive and possible. I’ve been lucky—they’ve responded to that instruction and have often surprised me with their insights.

      One of the hardest things to get across to them, though, was that it is neither weak nor childish to ask for help, to seek guidance, or to humbly accept wisdom from someone else. If a person is going to make their own decisions about how to live, they need information AND they need to understand how to process that information and act on it, thoughtfully. IMO, we do a poor job in this neck of the woods, at preparing our children to live thoughtful lives.

  2. Mark H.

    Maya,

    I think there are a myriad of subtle messages in Baha’u’llah’s statement regarding liberty.

    One could be that “liberty” is actually slavery. Slavery to one’s own greed, desires or trivial pursuits, for example.

    Also, as an American, I find an irony in many Americans going on about how “free” they are. In many instances, we’re captive to jobs or occupations we might not even like, so we can make money, and push our spending to the limit, to acquire things we might not really need, but society tells us we must have. And in a final stroke of irony, many of those things sit and gather dust, because we are so busy working, we haven’t the time to enjoy them.

    Or, on the flip side, having spent my share of time in the ranks of the working poor, many Americans are stuck in truly mind-numbing menial jobs — sometimes more than one such job — making hardly enough to make end meet, only to have to watch that afore-mentioned other half display all those flashy things.

    In either case, I ask, is this truly “freedom?”

    As a parent and step-parent, I echo your sentiments about raising children.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>