Health 101: Myth and Waiting

Health 101: Myth and Waiting

Our Spiritual Homeland

Here’s the big scary idea: Care in countries with universal health coverage is rationed with waiting lists and limited choice.

Yes, this is a real problem in some countries … including the US. I’ve had to wait for appointments simply because I couldn’t afford the out of pocket expenses or the copay. I’ve considered not renewing a prescription for a medicine I need because of our financial situation at the time. (That’s not rationing?)

True, patients in Britain and Canada may have to wait weeks or months for non-emergency care or elective surgeries. BUT, rationing is far from universal. In many other “developed” countries, folks get quicker access to care than we do in the States. Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden and Japan all do better than we do on both waits to see specialists and waits for elective surgery. And, as TR Reid found out, in Japan you can literally just walk into a doctor’s office without an appointment. (I’ve found one clinic here in SJ where you can do that and it’s always swamped.)

As to choice—Germans get over 200 private health insurance plans to choose from, which is a broader choice than many Americans have, even after the ACA went into effect. Plus, if they don’t like their plan, they can change it at any time without increasing their premiums.

epocheaufklaerungOh, and there’s no such thing as an “out of network” doctor. Right after I had brain surgery (yeah, yeah, I heard that mumbled, “Well that explains everything!”) my company moved to a new insurer. I was informed I’d have to do my follow-up exams with another neurophysician. My GP hit the ceiling and wrote the insurer insisting that I be able to see the doctor who’d done the surgery. I was blessed with a fierce GP. Not everyone has that.

Then there’s pre-authorization: having to make an appointment with, pay for and wait for an office visit with a GP in order to see a specialist. This saves money? Really? It sure doesn’t save time, and if time is money—well, there you have it. My German friends don’t have to do this. They just go to whatever doctor they think they need to see. My Canadian friends only have one choice for coverage, but they, too, can see any doctor they need because all doctors, hospitals and clinics are in-network. Some plans in other countries even pay for spas and health club memberships.

So, there it is. The fear of rationing and limited choice presupposes that we Americans aren’t smart enough to devise a plan that doesn’t have rationing or pre-authorizations. I’m pretty sure we are smart enough. If not, we can always hire a battalion of Japanese or Euro experts to help.

Oh, and lest I forget—here’s a statistic: 625 people lost their healthcare coverage in 2009 … every hour. This is not an economic problem, folks. It is a moral one.

“I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’ …whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.” — Jesus Christ, Matthew 25:40,45

But what about the bloated bureaucracies that are inherent in universal healthcare systems, you may ask. That certainly seems worth a look…

Share    Send article as PDF   

2 thoughts on “Health 101: Myth and Waiting

  1. Canada and UK have long wait times, because they are socialist, single payer systems. Just like our VA. That is why we need a multi-payer system of a choice of various insurance companies, like they have for example in Germany, France and Japan. It is a good system and it is universal insurance, which is what we need.

    1. I’m not sure the waits (which are for elective procedures, not urgent care) are any worse than what we experience with our system. We have good healthcare through my husband’s job and still have to book three weeks ahead to get an appointment for an exam from our family doctor. Socialized medicine is not the issue, but how it is implemented and how well its funded.

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.